P.D.RAJAN
VASANTHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
P.D. RAJAN, J.
1. The question under challenge in this appeal is the legality of the order of forfeiting the bail bond without giving show cause notice to the 2nd surety is sustainable in Law?
The appellants were sureties of the accused in S.C. No. 1675 of 2001 of the Additional Sessions Court Neyyattinkara (Abkari Act Cases) for offence punishable under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act. The accused in the above case was released on bail executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- each. During trial accused absconded and notices were issued to the sureties. Notice against first surety was served and no notice to the second surety. The appellants neither appeared before court nor shown any reason for their non appearance. In the circumstance, bond amount was forfeited and directed to recover the penalty amount as fine under the code of criminal procedure.
The accused subsequently appeared before trial court and took bail on 7.12.2005 on executing fresh surety bond. The case against the accused (SC No. 1675 of 2001) was tried in the Additional Sessions Court and he was acquitted by that Court. It is true that the accused was released on bail by the trial court on executing a bond for Rs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.