SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 1100

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
SREEJITH – Appellant
Versus
SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
SRI. P.M. ZIRAJ
GOVT. PLEADER SMT. C.K. SHERIN

Judgment

The batch of these petitions are filed for release of the vehicle seized by the Authorities for contravening provisions of Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules 2015 (hereinafter referred to as 'KMMC Rule' or Kerala Minerals (Prevention of Transportation) Rule 2015 (hereinafter referred to as Transportation Rules).

2. The petitioners in all these writ petitions seek an opportunity for compounding the offence.

3. The petitioners urge that there must be uniformity in fixing the compounding fee and they are all prepared to compound the offence.

4. The Rule 111 of the KMMC Rules provides compounding offence. The offence can be compounded by person authorized to file a complaint under Rule 110. Similarly Rule 32 of Transportation Rules also provides for compounding offence. It is also stipulates that the offence can be compounded by an authority who is authorized to file a complaint before the court in terms of Sec.22 of Kerala Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 (MMDR Act) or sub clause (ii) of Rule 2 of the Transportation Rules.

5. Sec.22 of the Mines and






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top