Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.

1. These review petitions are filed against a common judgment dated 27.06.2014. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. Disputes relating to seniority between promotees and direct recruits in the category of Draftsman Grade I in the Kerala Water Authority were the subject matter of two original petitions. They were decided as per a common judgment. That led to a bunch of writ appeals. They were allowed setting aside the impugned common judgment on the ground of non-joinder of necessary parties to the original petitions. Resultantly, the original petitions were remitted paving way for impleadment of the necessary parties and consideration of all issues after such impleadment. That judgment, which is an order of open remand, is sought to be reviewed on the premise that paper publication was made, with notice on the private respondents in the original petitions, who, going by the contentions, were impleaded in representative capacity, as well.

3. The learned senior counsel for the review petitioners argued that the finding in paragraph No.8 of the judgment sought to be reviewed is vitiated by error apparent on the face of the record, inasmuch as,