K.T.SANKARAN, BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH
Yohannan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
K.T. Sankaran, J.
1. The question involved in these appeals at present is whether there is any period of limitation for filing an appeal by the victim challenging the acquittal of the accused and if so, what is the period of limitation. All these appeals are filed by the victims in the respective cases. There is no dispute that the appellants are victims as defined in S. 2(wa)of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appeals were filed beyond ninety days from the date of the judgment passed by the Sessions Court. The Registry raised an objection that the appeals are time barred. The appellants take the stand that since there is no period of limitation for filing an appeal by the victim, there is no need to file any application for condonation of delay.
2. The proviso to S. 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides for an appeal by the victim. For the sake of convenience, Section 372 is extracted below:
"372. No appeal to lie unless otherwise provided.--No appeal shall lie from any judgment or order of a Criminal Court except as provided for by this Code or by any other
Ajaib Singh v. The Sirhind Co-operative Marketing-cum-Processing Service Society Ltd. & Anr.
Moideen Kova v. Kunhammed Haji
Padmanabha Pillai Arunachalam Pillai v. Narayana Pillai Natarajan & Anr.
Uttam Namdeo Mahale v. Vithal Deo & Ors.
Dadi Jagannadham v. Jammulu Ramulu & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.