SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Ker) 751

K.T.SANKARAN, P.D.RAJAN
Mohammed Shameer – Appellant
Versus
Ashokan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant : K.K. Mohamed Ravuf
For The Respondents: N. Deepa

JUDGMENT

K.T. Sankaran, J.

1. An ex parte order of eviction was passed by the Rent Control Court against the revision petitioner under S. 11(3) and 11(4)(iii) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The petitioner/tenant filed an application to set aside the ex parte order with an application to condone the delay in filing the application to set aside the ex parte order. Those applications were dismissed by the Rent Control Court. The tenant filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority against the order passed by the Rent Control Court in the application to set aside the ex parte order. In that appeal, the landlord filed an application under S. 12 of the Act to direct the tenant to deposit the admitted arrears of rent. Meanwhile, during the pendency of the appeal, the landlord took delivery of the building in execution of the order of eviction, since no stay was granted by the Appellate Authority in favour of the tenant. It is to be noted that the application was filed by the landlord under Section 12 of the Act before the Appellate Authority in 2014, much after the delivery of the building was taken by the landlord. The Appellat


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top