V.K.MOHANAN, K.HARILAL
Shaju P. L. – Appellant
Versus
Anitha – Respondent
K. Harilal, J.
1. The appellant is the petitioner in OP No. 529 of 2003 on the files of the Family Court, Thrissur. He is the husband of the respondent herein. The above OP was filed under Section 10(vii) and (x) of the Divorce Act, 1869 on the ground that the respondent has willfully refused to consummate the marriage and the marriage has, therefore, not been consummated and the non-consummation of the marriage amounted to an act of cruelty to him also. Both parties are Roman Catholic in Christian Religion. Their marriage was solemnised on 19/01/2000 in accordance with the religious customary rites and ceremonies. At the time of marriage, the appellant was working in a construction company in Sharjah. 28 days after the marriage, he returned to Sharjah for joining duty. Thereafter, he came back to India on leave on 11/04/2001 and returned to Sharjah on 01/07/2001. Again, he came on leave to India on 11/09/2002 and returned to Sharjah on 20/10/2002. Then, he again, came on leave to India on 09/04/2003 and this petition was filed on 11/06/2003. Though three years have been elapsed since the solemnisation of the marriage and he came on leave twice and cohabited as husband and w
State of Orissa and Others v. Md. Illiyas 2006 KHC 28 : AIR 2006 SC 258 : 2006 (1) SCC 275.
GS Mahalaxmi v. Shah Ranchhoddas 1969 KHC 579 : AIR 1970 SC 2025 : 1969 (2) SCC 853).
Joy v. Shilly 1995 KHC 349 : 1995 (2) KLT 546 : 1995 (2) KLJ 377 : ILR 1996 (1) Ker. 182
A v. B 1996 KHC 59 : 1996 (1) KLT 275 : ILR 1996 (2) Ker. 301.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.