SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Ker) 710

P.UBAID
PREMCHAND R. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BY ADVS.SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI, SMT.ANNA THOMAS
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.S. HYMA

ORDER

Petitioner herein is the accused in S.T. No. 678/2014 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Ramankary. While he was driving his car No. KL-1-X-911 along the Alappuzha- Changanassery public road, he was intercepted by the G.S.I. of Police, Nedumudi Police Station, on the ground that the vehicle was being driven by him rationally and negligently so as to endanger human life. He was arrested on the spot, the vehicle was also seized by the police, and later he was subjected to medical examination. On medical examination, it was detected that he had not consumed alcohol. However, the F.I.R. was prepared under Section 279 IPC. Later, the police submitted final report also under Section 279 IPC. The said final report is sought to be quashed, on the ground that this is really a false prosecution.

2. Finding that all the allegations in the final report are in printed form, and that even the statement given by the material witness under Section 161 Cr.P.C. is in a printed form, this Court directed the S.I. of Police to submit explanation. As regards the final report in printed form, he has some explanation, but there is absolutely no explanation why there is statement of a witne


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top