2015 Supreme(Ker) 1235
2015 (4) KLJ 688, 2015 (4) KLT 652
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
V. Chitambaresh, J.
Kerala Self Financing Engineering College Managements Association - Appellant
Vs.
Mahatma Gandhi University - Respondent
W.P.(C). Nos. 30126 and 30204 of 2015
Decided On : 09-11-2015
For the Appellant :Kurian George Kannanthanam, Sr. Advocate, Tony George Kannanthanam, Thomas George and Alexander Jospeh.
For the Respondents: Varughese M. Easo and Anitha Ravindran, Sr. Government Pleader.
Headnote:
Mahatma Gandhi University Act 1985 - Section 5 - Aided colleges affiliated to the university Examination hall - Installation of C.C TV Camera - Infrastructural facilities - Copying during examinations - Held, university vested with the right to award degrees has a concomitant duty to conduct the eligibility examination free from all mal-practices including copying. The conduct of the examinations in such a manner will certainly add to the impetus to study for a student thereby enhancing the quality of the course itself. The power to do such acts to further the objects of the university as a teaching and examining body can be found in S.5(xvii) of the Mahatma Gandhi University Act, 1985 - Every endeavour shall be made to install CCTV cameras in the examination halls of the colleges to function during examination hours
V. Chitambaresh, J.
1. A conference of the Vice Chancellors of the various universities in the State was convened by the Chancellor (The Governor of the State of Kerala) on 27.10.2014 at Ernakulam. One of the decisions taken in the meeting pertains to the installation of Closed Circuit Television Camera (CCTV Camera) in the examination centers of institutions. The syndicate standing committee on examination of the Mahatma Gandhi University accordingly on 20.3.2015 resolved to direct the installation of CCTV cameras. It was decided to direct the Principal of all self-financing institutions affiliated to the university to install CCTV cameras in the examination halls in the first phase. The Vice Chancellor of the university accorded sanction for the same as is discernible from the order dated 8.4.2015 issued by the Registrar of the university. The Registrar of the university by order dated 18.4.2015 issued instructions for installation of CCTV cameras in the examination hall. The instructions specified particular brands of CCTV camera of a specified storage capacity and the same was confined to the self-financing institutions only. The instructions further stipulated that the hard disk should be retained in the safe custody of the Principal to be produced before the university as and when required. The orders aforesaid dated 8.4.2015 and 18.4.2015 issued by the Deputy Registrar-I (Acad) on behalf of the Registrar of the University are impugned. The challenge is by the Kerala Self-Financing Engineering College Managements Association and All Kerala Private Arts and Science Unaided College Management Association. They are primarily aggrieved by the fact that particular brands of CCTV cameras are insisted and that self-financing institutions alone have been targeted. The university adopted the stand that it being the statutory authority to conduct examinations and award degrees has the powers to fix the minimum infrastructural facility to be provided. The installation of CCTV cameras as opined by the Chancellor was to improve the conduct of examinations and the quality of evaluation. True it is that particular brands of CCTV cameras was earlier insisted for uniformity and authenticity which condition has since been diluted. The managements are now free to select the brands of their choice of CCTV cameras for installation as is clarified by the order dated 14.10.2015 of the Registrar. Sections 5(xa) and 5(xvii) of the Mahatma Gandhi University Act, 1985 are relied on to contend that the University is well within its powers to issue such instructions.
2. I heard Mr. Kurian George Kannanthanam, Senior Advocate on behalf of the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 30126/2015 and Mr. Alexander Joseph, Advocate on behalf of the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 30204/2015. I also heard Mr. Varughese M. Easo, Standing Counsel for the Mahatma Gandhi University as well as Mrs. Anitha Ravindran, Senior Government Pleader.
3. The time has come for the CCTV cameras to be installed in the examination halls of the educational institutions as has been rightly opined by the Chancellor of the University. CCTV cameras meant for surveillance installed earlier in sensitive areas only have now spread to other places and even near Automated Teller Machines (ATM). The necessity to install CCTV cameras in the examination halls has arisen in view of the reporting of rampant copying during the examinations. The students may perhaps misuse the liberty given by the invigilators and indulge in impersonation or copying from bits and score high marks. The students who take pains to study and write the examinations without indulging in such mal-practices would end up getting lesser marks much to their disgust and frustration. The installation of CCTV cameras would certainly act as a deterrent for a student to indulge in the mal-practices aforesaid for fear of being detected eventually. This is not to say that such CCTV cameras should function even for class internals or viva