SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 1200

P.UBAID
Faisal – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : B.H. Mansoor
For the Respondents: M.T. Sheeba, Public Prosecutor

ORDER :

P. Ubaid, J.

1. A prosecution involving the offence under S. 26 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 is sought to be quashed. The petitioner herein is the sole accused in the said case, pending as S.C. No. 4/2015 before the Special Court for the Trial of Offence against Women and Children, Ernakulam. The police registered the crime against the petitioner suo motu on the basis of the report of a police constable that a juvenile aged 16 years was found employed in a petrol pump run by the petitioner herein. After investigation the police submitted final report under S. 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act. Annexure A is copy of the said final report. However, the trial court has framed a charge against the petitioner under S. 26 of the Juvenile Justice Act, it is submitted. On hearing both sides, I find that the prosecution is liable to be quashed. It is not known how merely employing a juvenile aged 16 years will come under S. 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act, or under S. 26 of the Juvenile Justice Act. To come under S. 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act, the alleged offence must have been committed by a person having actual charge or control over the juveni




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top