Back
K.VINOD CHANDRAN
Sreelatha – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
K. Vinod Chandran, J.
1. The petitioner in W.P.(C). No. 20737/2015 is aggrieved with the manner in which the appointments are made to the Higher Secondary School Teacher (H.S.S.T.) posts in the respondent school, specifically the ratio employed of 1:3 between; 'by transfer appointments' and direct recruitments. The controversy has arisen by reason of the method of appointment to the post of H.S.S.T. which is as provided in R. 4 of the Chapter XXXII of Kerala Education Rules ('KER' for short):
| Sl.No. | Category | Method of Appointment |
| 2 | Higher Secondary School Teacher | (1) By transfer from Junior Lecturer in the subject concerned under the management/Higher Secondary School Teacher (Junior)
(2) In the absence of qualified hands under clause (1) above, the vacancies shall be apportioned in the ratio 1:3 between appointment by transfer and direct appointment as detailed below:
(i) (a) By transfer from High School Assistants, who possess the requisite qualifications, under the Educational agency.
(b) In the ab |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
