IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K. Vinod Chandran, J.
Sreelatha – Appellant
Vs.
State of Kerala – Respondents
W.P.(C) Nos. 20737 and 24924 of 2015
Decided On : 14-10-2015
Kerala Education Rules 1959 - Rule 4 - Recruitment/Appointment - Held, ratio prescribed cannot be said to be to the cadre, since what is provided is only an alternate method of appointment wherein a ratio would have to be followed, with reference to the vacancies, to which appointments are made. If the contention of the petitioner is accepted, then once an HSA is appointed by transfer, for reason only of their being no qualified HSST (Junior), then that would have to be always filled up by 'by transfer' appointment from High School Section
K. Vinod Chandran, J.
1. The petitioner in W.P.(C). No. 20737/2015 is aggrieved with the manner in which the appointments are made to the Higher Secondary School Teacher (H.S.S.T.) posts in the respondent school, specifically the ratio employed of 1:3 between; 'by transfer appointments' and direct recruitments. The controversy has arisen by reason of the method of appointment to the post of H.S.S.T. which is as provided in R. 4 of the Chapter XXXII of Kerala Education Rules ('KER' for short):
| Sl.No. | Category | Method of Appointment |
| 2 | Higher Secondary School Teacher | (1) By transfer from Junior Lecturer in the subject concerned under the management/Higher Secondary School Teacher (Junior)
(2) In the absence of qualified hands under clause (1) above, the vacancies shall be apportioned in the ratio 1:3 between appointment by transfer and direct appointment as detailed below:
(i) (a) By transfer from High School Assistants, who possess the requisite qualifications, under the Educational agency.
(b) In the absence of qualified persons under (a) above, by transfer from qualified Upper Primary School Assistants/Lower Primary School Assistants who possess the requisite qualification in th subject concerned, under the Educational agency.
(ii) By direct recruitment
Note:- (i) When qualified persons are not available to fill up the vacancies set apart for appointment by transfer under item 2(i) above such vacancies shall also be alloted for direct appointment.
(ii) Appointments under item (I) above shall be made from select lists of qualified persons prepared on the basis of seniority and merit. |
The method of appointment hence is primarily by transfer from Junior Lecturer in the concerned subject. Only in the absence of such qualified hands could a different method be employed; which has to be in the ratio 1:3; between the qualified High School Assistants and Direct Recruits. It is also to be specifically noticed that the ratio is not to be applied to the cadre as such. The ratio, in the absence of qualified HSST (Junior), is to be applied apportioning the vacancies arising: between 'by transfer' and direct recruitment.
2. A High School Assistant has filed W.P.(C). No. 20737 of 2015 claiming that, the 1:3 ratio has to be maintained in the cadre and that, at any point of time for three direct recruitees, there should be one 'by transfer' appointee from H.S.A. The Manager (petitioner in W.P.(C). No. 24924/2015) however contends that, the ratio has to be maintained in the appointments and not in the cadre, since the appointment 'by transfer' from High School Assistants and Direct Recruitment can be resorted to only when the qualified hands in the Higher Secondary School Teacher (Junior) is not available.
3. The facts to be noticed are that, the school was upgraded in the academic year 2000-01 when there were sanctioned four posts of H.S.S.T. and seven posts of H.S.S.T. (Junior). Obviously, since no appointment could be made from H.S.S.T. (Junior), all the four H.S.S.T. posts were filled up by the alternate method of appointment. The ratio of 1:3 could have been maintained but the Manager appointed two persons from High School Assistants, being one P.B. Girijamoni and S. Unnikrishnan, and two persons from the open merit. In 2001-02, seven posts in the H.S.S.T. (Junior) were upgraded as H.S.S.T. and there existed then 11 posts of H.S.S.T. In 2002-03 again, two additional posts were sanctioned, making the total posts of H.S.S.T. to be 13. Of the two appointments then made, one was from the High School Section and the other by direct recruitment. Hence as on 2003 when six appointments were made by the alternate method, there were three persons appointed from the High School Section more than satisfying the quota; of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.