2015 Supreme(Ker) 1130
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V. Asha, J.
Dharma Paripalana Yogam - Appellant
Vs.
State of Kerala - Respondent
W.P.(C) No. 15593 of 2014
Decided On : 04-08-2015
For the Appellant : V. John Mani.
For the Respondents:Varughese M. Easo, Joice George, K.A. Jaleel, Addl. Advocate General and Noushad Thottathil, Government Pleader.
Headnote:
Education Law - Open of new Law College - Statues/Norms/Rules - Assumption - On the basis of policy government Refused to give Non Objection Certificate to start new law college in the district - Petition against - Held, Government decided not to sanction any more self financing college in District on assumption that it will affect quality of legal education no reason for such an assumption - Quality of legal education cannot be said to be a factor depending upon the number of educational institutions or availability of institutions in particular district - Moreover there is statutory body Bar Council of India as well as Bar Council of Kerala for monitoring standard and quality of legal education and of institutions imparting legal education - Government cannot have any say over that aspect except on instructions by those competent statutory bodies - Even on grant of NOC by Government, College can start functioning only after getting clearance from Bar Council, which is duty bound to ensure quality and standard of legal education to be imparted - Petition allowed
P.V. Asha, J.
1. Shree Dharma Paripalana Yogam, Palluruthy (SDPY) which is a society registered under the Travancore-Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955, along with its President; have filed this Writ Petition challenging Ext. P8 order issued by the Government, by which their application for NOC for starting a Self Financing Law College was rejected on the ground that the Government has taken a decision to consider only the applications from educational trusts from those districts where no legal educational institutions exist and further that more than two self Financing Law Colleges would not be sanctioned in a district in order to ensure the quality of legal educational institutions in the State. The petitioners challenge this order on the ground that the same is arbitrary. It is contended that sanctioning of more than two colleges in a district will not in any way affect the quality of legal education. It is also submitted that the right of an aspirant to legal education is curtailed on account of such decision of the Government. It is also pointed out that the Government is imposing restrictions in the case of law colleges alone, while no such restrictions are imposed in respect of medical colleges and engineering colleges.
2. The petitioners submitted an application Ext. P2 for starting a Self Financing Law College in Palluruthy in Ernakulam District. The subject for the course was mentioned as LLB (3 year regular course), LLB (3 years evening class) (LLB 5 years). The application was submitted before the Mahatma Gandhi University (hereinafter referred to as 'University') and on receipt of the same the University constituted an Inspection Committee as per Ext. P3 on 31.5.2013, as provided under Section 10(17) of the M.G. University Act, 1985. Accordingly, Professor Satheesh Kochuparambil (Member Syndicate) and Gifty Umman (Government Law College, Ernakulam) were constituted an Inspection Committee for the self financing law college under the petitioner for conducting the courses of LLB (3 year) evening classes and B.A. LLB. Thereafter on the basis of Ext. P4 order Syndicate Standing Committee on Affiliation in its meeting held on 11.4.2013 decided to recommend sanction for starting self financing Law Colleges for the academic year 2013-2014, after getting the view of Government on the necessity and feasibility of starting them. Thereafter the University forwarded the files to the Government for clearance/NOC as per Ext. P5 letter dated 14.6.2013. Thereafter as per Ext. P8 letter dated 5.9.2013, the Government rejected the application for the reasons mentioned earlier.
3. According to the petitioners, they have submitted their application in terms of the guidelines issued by Government, for starting new self financing law colleges, as provided in G.O. No. 89/2012/H. Edn. dated 12.3.2012 (Ext. P6), along with consent letter received from University, letter of undertaking etc. As per these guidelines, on receipt of this application, the Government have to accord administrative sanction to start the college under self financing stream. After administrative sanction is issued the files are to be forwarded to the Law Department. Thereafter on scrutiny by the Law Department they have to execute an agreement. After executing the agreement the NOC for starting college is issued by submitting the files to Minister for Education. It is provided that NOC shall be granted up to the end of the academic year. The educational agency is permitted to admit the students from the list published by the Commissioner for Entrance Examination till the last allotment process is over. It is also provided that the affiliation would be temporary and there will be no claim for permanent affiliation and Government or University can withdraw the NOC for affiliation on breach of conditions.
4. Though the Government refused sanction/NOC, intimation was received by the petitioner only after approaching this co