Ashok Bhushan, J.

1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant, the learned Government Pleader, the learned counsel appearing for the Panchayat as well as the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent and the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. This writ appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 7.7.2015 in W.P.(C) No. 10733 of 2015, by which, the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition filed by the first respondent. The brief facts of the case as emerged from the pleadings of the writ petition are as follows:-

The appellant had filed a complaint, Ext. P7, before the Kerala Lok Ayukta arraying seven respondents, wherein, the Grama Panchayat was the first respondent. In the complaint, allegations of corruption, maladministration, favouritism etc. were made in connection with the execution of a concession agreement under B.O.T. basis in favour of the 4th respondent therein. The Lok Ayukta issued an order, Ext. P8, on 12.3.2015 directing the first and fourth respondents not to proceed with the construction work in the petition schedule property and issued a notice, Ext. P9, on 21.3.2015 asking the Panchayat to appear on 16.6.2015. Challenging Ext. P8 order, th