SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 1163

A.HARIPRASAD
Vineeth – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Is it legal and proper for a person apprehending arrest in a non-bailable offence, whose application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, Cr. P.C.) was dismissed by the High Court or the Court of Sessions, as the case may be, to approach the same court with successive applications seeking the relief without establishing any change in the circumstances? Is it proper on the part of the Court of Sessions to entertain a bail application filed by an accused after the dismissal of his previous application by the High Court? These questions of importance are raised in this petition.

2. Heard both sides.

3. This application by the petitioner, apprehending arrest in Crime No. 559 of 2015 of Pandalam Police Station, is the third in succession. He, along with other accused, is involved in offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 148, 149, 447, 323, 324 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code (in short, IPC). There are specific allegations against the petitioner that he was armed with a dangerous weapon, viz., an iron rod and he unleashed attack on the de facto complainant causing serious injuries.

4. The petitioner, along with other accused in the crime ap


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top