B.KEMAL PASHA
Gracy Thomas – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
1. The husband of the petitioner is the accused in S.C. No. 176 of 2004 of the Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 55(a) and 8 (1) & (2) of the Abkari Act.
2. According to the petitioner, the accused is suffering from 80% disability and has become paralytic. It is also the case of the petitioner that the accused cannot understand any proceedings in court and is incapable of defending the case. It has been pointed out that he suffers from dementia and impaired cognition. The consultant physician of the General Hospital, Neyyattinkara has reported that the petitioner suffers from dementia and impaired cognition with 50% neurological disability. The learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that last time the accused was taken to the court by an ambulance and immediately he was enlarged on bail also. Of course, for framing charges, the presence of the accused is required. For all other postings of the case, the court below shall dispense with the personal appearance of the accused.
3. On going through the facts and circumstances of the case, it seems that the procedure contemplated under Section 318, Cr. P.C. have t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.