K.VINOD CHANDRAN
S. ABOOBACKER – Appellant
Versus
GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KADAVANTHRA, KOCHI – Respondent
The petitioner challenges Ext.P7 order passed by the respondent Authority. The short question to be considered is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to the pay and allowances between 24.02.1982 and 17.07.2003, when he was continued on suspension; allegedly illegally and whether he would also be entitled to the due promotions during the said period as if he had been continued regularly in employment under the respondent Authority.
2. The facts indicate that the petitioner, who was working as an Assistant Grade I, was suspended on 24.02.1982 on allegation of having colluded with six others, one of whom was the Chairman of the respondent Authority, in perpetrating an offence leading to loss, occasioned to the respondent. The allegation was that the petitioner; with the active connivance of six others illegally diverted 1720 MT of cement, purchased by the respondent Authority from Tamil Nadu Cement Corporation and supplied through SIDCO. A criminal case was registered against the petitioner and six others as C.C No. 153 of 1983.
3. The petitioner was the first accused in the case and the Chairman of the respondent Authority was the 6th accused; the latter of whom, died du
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.