SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ker) 143

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
DARLENE CARMELITA D" CRUZ – Petitioner
Versus
THE KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 18844 of 2005
Decided On : 08-04-2016

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: SRI. S. SANTHOSH KUMAR, ADV.
For the Respondent: SRI. P.C. IYPE, SC, KSHB, SRI. SERGI JOSEPH THOMAS, DR. K.P. KYLASANATHA PILLAY, SRI. ARUN B. VARGHESE, SMT. SREEDEVI KYLASANATH, SRI. T.P. DEYANANTHAN, SRI. JESSEL VINOHAR RODRICKS, SRI. SERGI JOSEPH THOMAS, SRI. P. GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR, SRI. A. JAYASANKAR, SC KSHB, TVM, SRI. GEORGE BOBAN, SC, KSHB.

Headnote:

Kerala State Housing Board Act 1971 - Sections 53 and 55 - Kerala State Housing Board (Formation of Allottees Associations) Regulations 2000 - Kerala Apartment Ownership Act 1983 - Sections 12 and 3 (j) - Apartment constructed with the intention of providing residence to an owner and if a recital is made to that effect in the sale deed then the owner of the apartment and his successors-in-interest in any manner are bound to obey and comply with the restrictive clause contained under the sale deed - when the case at hand is taken into account, it is admitted that the apartment structure in which the petitioners are occupying are residential apartments meant for residence of its purchasers or their successors-in-interest or lessees and it cannot be put to any use other than for the purpose of residence. No activity other than housing can be carried on in such residential apartment complexes

JUDGMENT :

SHAJI P. CHALY, J.

1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioners seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 to take action in order to prevent use of apartments in Chinnakkada Housing Accommodation Scheme, Site II of the Housing Board at Kollam for commercial purposes and to ensure that apartments are used purely for residential purposes and other related relieves.

2. Necessary facts required for the disposal of the writ petition are as follows:

3. Petitioners are owners of flats purchased from the 1st respondent, in its Housing Accommodation Scheme, Site II at Chinnakkada in Kollam. They are aggrieved by the inaction of the Board in taking action against the use of flats in the housing scheme for purposes not provided under this scheme. The Kerala State Housing Board is a statutory authority created under the Kerala State Housing Board Act, 1971, hereinafter called the Act, for the execution of housing and improvement schemes in Kerala. In accordance with the powers conferred on the Board under the said statute, it formulated a scheme under Section 42 of the Act, 1971 viz. Chinnakkada Housing Accommodation Scheme, Site - II for the construction of 24 EF-9 type flats. The scheme was sanctioned by the Government as per G.O.(MS) No.38/92/Housing dated 27.7.1992 and notified under Section 55 of the Act, evident from Ext.P1. Shop rooms and commercial buildings with office space mentioned in the notification are situated away from the residential buildings.

4. Board has constructed 4 blocks of multi-storied building. There are 6 apartments in each block. Petitioners purchased flats by executing a sale deed with the 3rd respondent. First petitioner purchased flat No.EF-9/308 as per registered sale deed No.1147/1/2004 dated 29.3.2004 and 2nd petitioner purchased flat No.EF-9/207 as per registered sale deed No.651/04 dated 27.2.2004, of S.R.O., Kollam.

5. It is the contention of the petitioners that, they are residing in the said flats along with their families. The flats in the housing scheme are exclusively meant for residential purposes. Sale deeds provide that the flats shall not be used for any purpose other than residential purpose. Likewise clause 19 of the Hire Purchase Agreement in respect of persons who opt for hire purchase also provides that the parties shall not use the building and premises thereto directly or indirectly for any purpose other than the purpose of his own residence.

6. It is contended that Regulation 6(1) of Kerala State Housing Board (Formation of Allottees Associations) Regulations, 2000, hereinafter called Regulations, also provides that all apartments in the housing scheme shall be used purely for residential purposes. In spite of the specific stipulation in the sale deed, hire purchase agreement and in the regulations, many of the allottees of flats have let out their flats for using it for commercial purposes to various persons. It is the specific contention of the petitioners that, there are godowns, offices, sales outlet etc. etc. functioning in the housing complex, that 14 flats are now being used for commercial purposes. The details of the flats used for commercial purposes are as follows:-

Flat

Allottee

Lessee

Purpose for which the flat is put to use

104

S. Thulasidharan

M/s. Bright Auto spares Pvt. Ltd.

Godown-cum-office

105

Ike Thomas

ANERT

Office-cum-godown

106

P.N. Narayana Pillai

Speed & Safe Courier Service

Office

107

Viswambaran

M/s. Rajkumar & Company (Contractors & Engineers)

Office

108

M. Pulomaja Devi

M/s. Rajkumar & Company (Contractors)

Office

201

N. Anirudhan

M/s. Girish & Associates (Architects)

Office

203

Kunjoojamma Baby

Civil Asst. Engineer's Office, BSNL

Office

204

Soosamma Mathew

Chits & Financing Co.

Office

205

Beena Bhai

Ajaykumar

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top