P.D.RAJAN
Shiju K. – Appellant
Versus
Nalini – Respondent
P.D. Rajan, J.
1. This revision petition is preferred by the accused against the judgment in Criminal Appeal 150/02 of the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Kozhikode. Revision Petitioner was accused in CC 351/99 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-V, Kozhikode for having committed an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the N.I. Act). The complainant's case is that, accused borrowed a sum of Rs. 1,17,500/- from the complainant and in discharge of that debt, he issued Ext. P1 cheque. When the cheque was presented for encashment, it was dishonoured for the reason of funds insufficient. The complainant demanded the due amount by giving a notice in writing, but after notice, there was no repayment of the due amount, hence he filed a complaint before Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kozhikode. During trial, complainant was examined as PW1 and his documents were marked as Exts. P1 to P7. The incriminating circumstances brought out in evidence were denied by the accused while questioning him under Section 313 Cr.P.C. Accused did not adduce any defence evidence. The learned Magistrate convicted the accused under Section 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.