K.HEMA
Retnamma – Appellant
Versus
Mehaboob – Respondent
K. Hema, J.
A suit was filed by plaintiffs-respondents before Munsiff Court, for fixation of boundary and recovery of possession of plaint schedule property. After trial, Munsiff Court dismissed suit. Aggrieved by the dismissal of the suit, plaintiffs-respondents filed an appeal. The Sub Court allowed the appeal and a decree was granted for fixation and demarcation of boundary, with reference to the boundary shown in Ext.C3, Surveyor's plan. A decree for recovery of possession was also granted in respect of the specific plot shown by the Surveyor in Ext.C3-plan and the said plan forms part of the decree. Aggrieved by the decree and judgment, the defendants in the suit has filed this second appeal.
2. Facts briefly: The suit was filed by respondents herein against appellants on the averments that they are the absolute owners of the plaint schedule property, as per Ext.A1, which is a sale deed dated 21.11.1966. Out of the said property, two plots having an extent of 10 cents and 7 cents were sold to one Kamaluddin and Jaleel respectively. Excluding the said property, 8 cents of property are still in possession of plaintiffs, which is fragmented into two pieces: the plot havin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.