K.HARILAL
P. S. George – Appellant
Versus
Balkrishanan – Respondent
K. Harilal, J.
The appellant is the 3rd defendant in O.S.No.419/1999 on the files of the Munsiff's court, Wadakkanchery, as well as the appellant in A.S.No.102/2003 on the files of the Additional District and Sessions Court, (Fast Track Court No. I), Thrissur. The above Original Suit was one for recovery of possession on the strength of title with future mesne profit. The 3rd defendant, inter alia, contended that his title and possession over the property sought to be recovered from him is perfected by adverse possession. After considering the evidence on record, the learned Munsiff decreed the suit as prayed for, granting recovery of possession. Feeling aggrieved, though the appellant had preferred the above Appeal Suit, the learned District Judge also concurred with the findings of the Trial Court and dismissed the appeal. This Regular Second Appeal is filed by the 3rd defendant challenging the concurrent findings of the courts below, on various grounds.
PLEADINGS
2. The plaint averments necessary for disposal of this RSA can be encapsulated as follows: The parties are referred to as in the Original Suit. The 2nd the 3rd plaintiffs are the title holders in possession of pl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.