A.M.SHAFFIQUE
RAJAN DAVID – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT SPORTS AND YOUTH AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – Respondent
Petitioner challenges the order passed by the 2nd respondent dismissing him from service which was confirmed by the 1st respondent in the revision filed by the petitioner.
2. The facts as disclosed would reveal that the petitioner joined Kerala Sports Council as a Basket Ball Coach in 1994. He was served with Ext.P1 memo of charges alleging certain misconducts. Initially, a member of Sports Council was appointed as enquiry officer. Later the enquiry was entrusted to Sri. P.Babu, retired Joint Labour commissioner. Ext.P6 is the report of enquiry. It was found that the charges 1, 2 and 4 against the petitioner were proved. Petitioner was served with Ext.P6 notice to show cause why action should not be taken against him pursuant to the findings in the enquiry report. Ext.P7 is the said show cause notice. Petitioner submitted a detailed explanation as Ext.P8. However, the Sports Council in its meeting held on 10/08/2011 directed termination of service of the petitioner with effect from 02/09/2011. Ext.P9 is the minutes of the Sports Council Meeting and Ext.P10 is the order issued to the petitioner. Petitioner preferred revision before the Government to cancel the resolution un
Apparal Export Promotion Council v. A.K.Chopra
Ajit Kumar Nag v. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd.
Gurjeewan Garewal (Dr.) v. Sumitra Dash (Dr.)
H.V. Nirmala v. Karnataka State Financial Corpn.
Managing Director ECIL Hyderabad and Others v. B.Karunakar and Others
State of Assam v. Kanak Chandra Dutta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.