SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ker) 6

A.M.SHAFFIQUE, K.RAMAKRISHNAN
KABEER S/O P. M. HAMEED – Appellant
Versus
NAZRIN D/O NIZAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: SRI. M. PREMCHAND & SRI. C.S. SUMESH.

JUDGMENT :

A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

1. This original petition is filed challenging Ext.P5 by which an application filed by the petitioner herein for removing the counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent from representing the respondent has been rejected by the Family Court while dismissing IA No. 1396/2015 in OP No. 137/2010 as per order dated 3.9.2016.

2. The main contention urged by the petitioner was that in terms of Rule 6 of the Bar Council of India Rules, there is a prohibition for an Advocate to appear on behalf of a party to the lis if any member thereof is related to the Advocate or comes within the relationships mentioned therein. Further, it is contended that the petitioner intends to examine the Advocate as a witness in the case and therefore the Advocate should not be permitted to appear on behalf of the respondent.

3. The respondent objected to the above contentions and filed their objection inter-alia contending that there is no reason warranting change of lawyer as contended by the petitioner.

4. The Family Court after elaborately considering the matter observed that the facts involved in the case do not require examining the Advocate as a witness and further it was held








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top