B.KEMAL PASHA
GEETHAMANI – Appellant
Versus
PREMAKUMARI – Respondent
Challenging the concurrent findings entered by the Munsiff's Court, Chavakkad in O.S. No.283/1999 followed by those of the I Additional District Court, Thrissur in A.S. No.126/2005, the plaintiff in O.S.No.283/1999 has come up in this Regular Second Appeal.
2. The suit was originally one for declaration that Ext.B3 Will dated 06.04.1984 registered as deed No.4/1984 of the Andathodu Sub Registry Office was illegal and void and that the defendants or any person other than the plaintiff have no manner of right over the plaint schedule property. The plaint schedule property is 22 ¾ cents and a house building thereon.
3. The plaintiff is admittedly the only daughter and sole legal heir of deceased Madhavan Nair. The mother of the plaintiff died in her childhood, when she was only 4 years old. Thereafter, the plaintiff was being looked after and maintained by her maternal uncle and others. Madhavan Nair died on 25.06.1995. It has come out that on 06.04.1984, Madhavan Nair had executed Ext.B3 Will, thereby bequeathing all his properties in equal shares to his sister Parukkutti Amma and defendants 1 to 4. Defendants 1 and 2 are the daughters of Parukkutti Amma, and defendants 3 and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.