A.M.SHAFFIQUE, K.RAMAKRISHNAN
PRINCE – Appellant
Versus
MANJU – Respondent
Shaffique, J.
Since both these appeals arise out of the common judgment dated 18/5/2015 in OP No. 655/11 and OP (HMA) 1137/2011 of the Family Court Kollam, they are heard and decided together.
2. Mat.Appeal No.785/2015 is filed against the judgment in OP No. 655/11 by the respondents and Mat.Appeal No.822/15 has been filed by the respondent in OP(HMA) No.1137/11.
3. For easy reference, parties to the marriage are referred to as husband and wife. OP No.655/11 was filed by the wife claiming return of gold ornaments and for recovery of money from the husband, who is arrayed as the 1st respondent and respondents 2 and 3, his father and mother.
4. The short facts arising in the case are as under:-
The parties got married as per customary rites and ceremonies of Hindu Ezhava community on 17/6/2001. The wife contended that at the time of marriage, she was given 107 sovereigns of gold ornaments and Rs.5 lakh was given to the husband on 30/5/2001. The said amount was deposited at SBT, Pathanapuram Branch in the account of the husband's father. It is alleged that after marriage, a demand was being made for more dowry and she was being harassed. According to her, she was driven out of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.