SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ker) 1052

ANTONY DOMINIC, DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
J. Sankar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: K.V. Sohan
For the Respondents: D. Kishore

JUDGMENT :

Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.

Introduction:

1. Two persons borrow money from a bank by depositing their title deeds as security. They register the transaction. The loan satisfied, the borrowers want the title deeds back. The banker and the borrowers execute a deed of cancellation and present it for registration. The Registration Department wants to treat the cancellation deed either as a reconveyance or as a deed relating to deposit of title deeds—exacting higher stamp duty.

2. The questions to be answered are these: (a) Does the cancellation deed amount to “an agreement relating to deposit of title deeds” under Article 6 of the Schedule to the Kerala Stamp Act? Or (b) does the cancellation deed “reconvey the mortgaged property” attracting stamp duty under Article 47 of the same Schedule?

Facts in Brief:

3. In this writ appeal, the State assails the judgment dated 11.8.2017 in W.P.(C)No. 21855/17.

4. The respondents 1 and 2 obtained a loan from the third respondent Bank and deposited their title deeds as security. This offering of security is technically termed 'mortgage by deposit of title deeds'—an equitable mortgage. Though simple handing over the title deeds would suffice, the ba




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top