SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ker) 1059

P.N.RAVINDRAN, DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
Arundas S/o. Dasappan – Appellant
Versus
Priji S/o. M. K. Narayana Pillai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri. P. Sathisan

JUDGMENT :

Devan Ramachandran, J.

The unexpendable imperative for courts to ensure valid and proper service of summons and notices to defendants in a suit and other proceedings can never be overstated. The one singular precaution that courts have to be always cognizant of, to avert challenge to its orders and proceedings, is to make sure that the parties to litigation are served as per the prescription of the statutory provisions relating to such.

2. Although the term “summons” is not defined in the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, “the CPC'), its proper service on the defendant is a fundamental rule of procedure. The significance of valid service of summons, in whatever way it may be effected, is that the defendant will be informed of the institution of the suit or the proceeding against him and he will thus be extended sufficient opportunity to resist it. The defendant's actual knowledge of the suit or proceeding would, in most cases, become irrelevant if service of summons or notice on him, as per the statutory mandate, is shown beyond reasonable doubt.

3. The importance of this can never be lost sight of when we see that first defence and sometimes offence, to a suit or proceedi
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top