SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ker) 1111

ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Santu Thomas – Appellant
Versus
Joint Regional Transport Officer – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:P. Deepak, Advocate
For the Respondents: C.S. Sheeja, Government Pleader

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner, who is the holder of a driving licence bearing No.40/2480/2005, is before this Court in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P3 proceedings of the respondent dated 27.10.2017, issued in exercise of the powers under Section 19 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, (for brevity, 'the Act').

2. On 25.10.2017, the petitioner was issued with Ext.P1 notice to show cause why proceedings shall not be initiated against him under Section 19 of the Act disqualifying him from holding the driving licence or to revoke the driving licence. The said notice was issued in connection with Crime No.2386/2017 of Vaikom Police Station, registered in connection with a motor accident occurred on 11.10.2017, alleging offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 involving a goods carriage driven by the petitioner, resulting in the death of a pillion rider in a motorcycle.

3. On receipt of Ext.P1 notice, the petitioner submitted Ext.P2 reply. On 27.10.2017, the petitioner was heard by the respondent and thereafter, he has been issued with Ext.P3 proceedings dated 27.10.20













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top