IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Anil K. Narendran, J.
Kunjalavi Chellamma - Appellant
Vs.
District Geologist - Respondent
WP(C).No. 17078 of 2016 (H)
Decided On : 17-08-2016
Kerala Municipality Building Rules, 1999 - Kerala Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Storage and Transportation) Rules, 2015 - R.17 - Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 - Rr. 14( 1) & 14( 2) & 108 - Construction of residential buildings including flats or commercial buildings - Permission from Local Government - Held, If no construction is commenced immediately following such extraction and removal of earth, an inference can be drawn that it was an attempt made by the land owner to extract ordinary earth from the property in question, without obtaining a quarrying permit in terms of sub-rule (1) of Rule 14 of KMMC Rules, 2015 - provisions under R.17 of the Kerala Panchayat Buildings Rules, 2011 or that under R.15A of the Kerala Municipality Building Rules, 1999, which provide for validity, extension and renewal of the periods of building permits, would not stand in the way of the authorised officers invoking the penal provisions under the KMMC Rules, 2015 - provisions under sub-rule (2) of R.14 have application only if the extraction of ordinary earth from the land is in connection with the construction of residential buildings including flats or commercial buildings having a plinth area of 300 square metres, for which the owner of the land has already obtained a valid permit from the Local Self Government
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner, who is stated to be the owner in possession of 15.20 Ares of property in Sy.No.366/28 of Pavithreshwaram Village in Kottarakkara Taluk has filed this Writ Petition mainly seeking for a writ of mandamus commanding the District Geologist, Kollam, the 1st respondent herein, to issue Mineral Transit Pass in Form O(A) under Rule 25 read with Rule 26 of the Kerala Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Storage and Transportation) Rules, 2015, for transportation of ordinary earth from the said property in connection with the construction of a residential building for which she has obtained Ext.P1 building permit dated 7.4.2015 from Pavithreshwaram Grama Panchayat.
2. Going by the averments in the Writ Petition, the petitioner wants to develop 10.20 Ares out of 15.20 Ares in Sy.No.366/28 of Pavithreshwaram Village as a plot fit for construction of residential building, after extracting ordinary earth from the said property, which lies at an elevation of few meters above the road level. In order to construct a residential building, the petitioner has obtained Ext.P1 building permit bearing No.A3-2304/15 dated 7.4.2015 from Pavithreshwaram Grama Panchayat. Thereafter, she submitted an application before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kollam along with Ext.P1 building permit and connected records. The RDO forwarded the said application to the 1st respondent, for consideration as per rules. However, the said application was neither considered nor rejected by the 1st respondent. Therefore, the petitioner has approached this Court in this Writ Petition seeking various reliefs. The petitioner has also relied on Ext.P2 judgment of this Court dated 17.3.2016 in W.P.(C).No.10347 of 2016, a decision rendered by a learned Judge of this Court on similar set of facts.
3. On 10.5.2016, when this Writ Petition came up for admission, the learned Counsel for the petitioner sought for disposal of the same in terms of Ext.P2 judgment. Therefore, after hearing the learned Government Pleader, the Writ Petition was disposed of, by directing the 1st respondent to issue sufficient Mineral Transit Pass in Form O(A) to the petitioner without restricting the number of vehicles to be deployed by her and subject to the other conditions as contained in Ext.P2 judgment.
4. While reading the draft judgment of the writ Petitions disposed of on 10.5.2016, it was noticed that the building permit produced as Ext.P1 in W.P.(C)No.17078 of 2016 and that produced as Ext.P1 in W.P.(C)No.17080 of 2016 (filed by another resident of Pavithreswaram Grama Panchayat seeking identical reliefs in respect of 03.03 Ares of property in Sy.No.362/17-4-2 of Pavithreswaram Village) bear the same number and date, i.e., 'No.A3-2034/15 dated 7.4.2015'. In both the building permits, the total plinth area of the proposed building is shown as 217.11 sq.meters (Ground Floor - 126.16 sq.meter + First Floor - 90.95 sq.meter).
5. Prima facie, it appeared that Ext.P1 building permit produced along with both the Writ Petitions are photocopy of the very same document, except the changes in the name of the permit holder and survey number of the property. In both the Writ Petitions, the petitioners have not chosen to produce the building plan/site plan, which forms an integral part of the building permit. In view of serious doubts as to the genuineness of Ext.P1 building permits, the Registry was directed to list the Writ Petitions as 'to be spoken to' on 11.5.2016, with notice to Shri. Alexander George, the learned counsel for the petitioner in both the Writ Petitions and also the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.
6. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader, this Court by order dated 11.5.2016 directed the petitioners in both the Writ Petitions to produce, along with an interlocutory application for accepting additional documents, the original of Ext.P1 building permit along the building plan and si
Chandra Shashi Vs. Anil Kumar Verma
Dhananjay Sharma Vs. State of Haryana
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.