SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 1496

P.D.RAJAN
K. Moidotty – Appellant
Versus
Usman – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :C. Khalid, Advocate
For the Respondent: P. Venugopal and N. Suresh Public Prosecutor

ORDER :

P.D. Rajan, J.

The question under challenge in this case is whether the conducting of 'case and counter case' by the same Asst. Public Prosecutor amounts to an illegality, when both cases arise out of police charge sheet? This revision petition is preferred against the judgment in C.C.No.369/1998 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Malappuram by the defacto complainant. The accused was charge sheeted by the Judicial First Class Magistrate for having committed an offence punishable under Section 326 IPC. The charge against the accused is that on 19.7.1998 at about 9.45 p.m., while PW1 was proceeding to his room in the lodge at Parambilangadi, accused voluntarily caused grievous hurt to him by beating with a torch on his left leg and left hand as a result, he sustained serious injuries on his elbow and tibia, thereby committed the offence. Kottakkal Police registered a Crime and after investigation laid charge before Judicial First Class Magistrate, Malappuram. During trial, prosecution examined PW1 to PW11 and marked Exts.P1 to P6. MO1 was admitted in evidence. The incriminating circumstances brought out in evidence were denied by the accused, while questioning him. He did














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top