SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 1406

P.D.RAJAN
RATHEESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :C.M. Tomy and Mathew Skaria, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Sareena George.

JUDGMENT :

P.D. RAJAN, J.

1. The appellant, who is the accused in S.C.No.618/2004 of Additional Sessions Judge, Thodupuzha, (Adhoc)-II, challenges the judgment of conviction under section 309 r/w 109 IPC. He was sentenced to simple imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, simple imprisonment for three months, being aggrieved by that, he preferred this appeal.

2. The prosecution case is that on 8.11.2003, accused abetted Bajitha to commit suicide and on 9.11.2003 at 11 a.m. she consumed poison entrusted by the appellant, as a result, she became unconscious, immediately, she was taken to Taluk hospital, Thodupuzha and thereafter at Holy Family hospital, Muthalakodam where she had undergone treatment. Karimannoor Police registered crime No.200/2003 and after investigation, the Sub Inspector of Police, Karimannoor laid charge under section 306 IPC before Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Thodupuzha., from there it was committed to Sessions Court.

3. To prove the offence, prosecution examined PW1 to PW12 and marked Exts.P1 to P9 as documentary evidence. MO1 series were marked as material objects and Exts.D1 to D5 were marked during examination o













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top