SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ker) 887

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. Ubaid, J.
Chandrika - Appellant
Vs.
State of Kerala - Respondent
Bail Appl. No. 2989 of 2016
Decided On : 23-06-2016

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri. Manu Roy
For the Respondent: Smt. Laliza T.Y.

Headnote:

Kerala Abkari Act, 1077 - Section 55(i) - Search and Seizer of foreign liquor - Purpose of illicit sale - Accused not arrested on spot - Anticipatory bail - Held, No explanation or reason by the Excise Inspector why the accused was not arrested on the spot - This is not a case where the accused ran off and escaped from the spot - It is appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner in the above situation - Appeal allowed.

ORDER :

P. Ubaid, J.

The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail on the apprehension of arrest in Crime No. 76 of 2016 of the Nooranad Excise Range, registered under Section 55(i) of the Kerala Abkari Act.

2. It is alleged that at about 9.00 p.m. on 6.4.2016, the petitioner was found possessing 1550 ml of Indian Made Foreign Liquor for the purpose of illicit sale. The Excise party came there for search on the basis of reliable information. The petitioner was very much present there, but she was not arrested on the spot by the Excise Officials. However, the liquor was seized as per the mahazar, and a crime was registered. Now the petitioner apprehends arrest by the Excise Inspector.

3. This application for pre-arrest bail is opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor on the ground that investigation is at the preliminary stage, that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is absolutely necessary as part of investigation, and that if the accused is now released, she will definitely obstruct the proper and effective investigation.

4. On hearing both sides, and on a perusal of the materials including the case diary and the report of the Investigating Officer, I find that the petitioner can be granted pre-arrest bail. The Excise Inspector does not have any satisfactory explanation or reason why the accused was not arrested on the spot. This is not a case where the accused ran off and escaped from the spot. I feel it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner in the above situation.

5. In the result, this petition for pre arrest bail is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her executing a bond with two solvent sureties for Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer or the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction, in case of her arrest in connection with Crime No. 76 of 2016 of the Nooranad Excise Range. Bail is granted on condition that;

(a) The petitioner shall report before the investigating officer between 10 am and 11 am on all Wednesdays for a period of six.

(b) The petitioner shall not involve in any offence under the Kerala Abkari Act, till trial of the case is over.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top