SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ker) 1171

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
Joseph John – Appellant
Versus
Rejeena – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Dr. V.N. Sankarjee, Sri. V.N. Madhusudanan, Smt. R. Udaya Jyothi, Smt. M. Suseela, Smt. Mary John and Sri. S. Sidhardhan, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

A. Muhamed Mustaque, J.

This original petition is necessitated on account of confusion entertained by the court below in the matter of issuing certified copy of probate.

2. The petitioner based on the order of grant of probate applied for issuance of a copy of the certificate of probate under the seal of court. However, the court did not issue certificate. The reason reflected in the report of the learned District Judge placed before this court is that court fees stamp papers are not useful for engrossing probate certificate. It was insisted by the court that probate certificate can be issued only after engrossing it on non-judicial stamp papers.

3. Indian Succession Act defines probate under section 2F as follows:

"probate" means the copy of a Will certified under the seal of a Court of competent jurisdiction with a grant of administration to the estate of the testator;

Section 289 of Indian Succession Act reads as follows :

"Grant of probate to be under seal of Court : When it appears to the District Judge or District Delegate that probate of a Will should be granted, he






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top