SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Ker) 940

K.HARILAL
Sulaiman Kunju – Appellant
Versus
Nabeesa Beevi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :B. Harish Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ajaya Kumar G., Advocate, Liju V. Stephen, Public Prosecutor

ORDER :

K. Harilal, J.

The revision petitioner is the respondent in M.C.No.15/2009 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Kayamkulam. The above M.C. was filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and sought for reliefs under Sections 17, 18, 19 and 20. The learned Magistrate passed an order restraining the revision petitioner from making any kind of obstruction to the peaceful living of the 1st respondent and her children in the shared household mentioned in the petition and also from committing any kind of domestic violence towards the 1st respondent. Further, the revision petitioner is directed to pay maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs. 2,000/- to the 1st respondent and Rs. 1,500/- each to her two children, per month from the date of the order. He was restrained from alienating or encumbering the property wherein the shared household is situated, without the leave of the court. This order is under challenge in this Revision Petition.

2. It is the case of the 1st respondent that she is the legally wedded wife of the revision petitioner and they have got two children in the wed-lock and they are aged 17 and 14 years r











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top