SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 1462

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
ALFRED THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A. Ahzar.
For the Respondent: K.A. Sanjeetha, Senior GP.

JUDGMENT :

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the denial of registration of himself and other employees under Rule 26 (a) of the Kerala Head Load Workers Rules (for short, "the Rules") as per Ext. P2 order and Ext. P3 appeal. The petitioner alleges that he is running a parcel service, which is a branch of A1 Travels, Coimbatore. The said speed parcel service is functioning at A1 Travels, Room No. XI/446, CSI Mini Shopping Complex, Near Muthoot Group, Bakery Junction, Kottayam District. He has applied for registration of himself as well as other employees under Rule 26(a) of the Rules, which was denied as per Ext. P2 order. Ext. P3 appeal was also rejected. According to the petitioner, in the establishment of the petitioner, daily loading and unloading is necessary and if the registration is not granted immediately, the same would lead to untold hardship, irreparable injury and misery. Hence, this writ petition.

2. In the statement filed by the 2nd respondent, it is stated as follows;

"The petitioner has registered his name as an employer before the District Committee and has got registration as Reg. No. 1008/12. The petitioner's father was running the establi




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top