K.HARILAL, P.SOMARAJAN
ABDUL HAKKIM – Appellant
Versus
SHAMAZ ABDUL MAJEED – Respondent
Harilal, J.
Since these revisions are filed challenging a common judgment passed by the Appellate Authority in RCANos.27/2014 and 34/2014 and the parties are common, the Rent Control Revisions are heard together and disposed of accordingly.
2. The revision petitioners are the tenants against whom an order of eviction has been passed concurrently under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (for short, “the Act”). According to the landlord, the petition schedule shop rooms belonged to his parents Shakkeela Majeed and Abdul Majeed and the respondents in the Rent Control Petitions were tenants under them. After the death of his father, his mother and children entered into Ext.A1 partition deed and as perExt.A1 partition deed the petition schedule shop rooms and remaining two other rooms situated in the ground floor were allotted to the petitioner and thereafter the tenants were attorned to him and they are paying rent to him. He bona fide needs the petition schedule building for starting a shop of hard wares and paints. He has no other building of his own to start the said business; but the tenants have in their possession other suitable building
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.