SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Ker) 842

A.HARIPRASAD
ABDUL HAMEED – Appellant
Versus
STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHERPULASSERY POLICE STATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mansoor B.H.

ORDER :

A. Hariprasad, J.

Petitioner is the 3rd accused in Crime No. 280 of 2007 of Cherpulassery Police Station, arraigned in offences punishable under Sections 9(B)(1)(b) of Explosive Substances Act and Section 3 read with 7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act and LPG (Regulation of Supply and Distribution) Order, 2000. Annexure-I is the copy of the FIR in the crime. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the entire allegations in the FIR, taken if true, will not make out a case against the petitioner for proceeding under any of the provisions mentioned above.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. It is seen from Rule 13 of LPG (Regulation of Supply and Distribution) Order, 2000, that any officer of the Central or the State Government, not below the rank of inspector duly authorised by a general or special order by the concerned Government has the power of entry, search and seizure of the articles covered by the Rule. In this case, the FIR shows that Sub Inspector of Police, on receiving a telephonic information, intercepted a goods vehicle, which was found carrying 23 LPG cylinders without proper authority. Learned counsel


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top