N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
Joeseph George – Appellant
Versus
John – Respondent
N.K. Balakrishnan, J.
The defendant in a suit for malicious prosecution is the appellant. The suit was decreed by the trial court directing him to pay Rs.1 lakh to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of payment. In the appeal, the appellate court confirmed the decree with regard to the compensation of Rs.75,000/- decreed in favour of the plaintiff as general damages but set aside the decree with regard to the special damages claimed by the plaintiff to the tune of Rs.25,000/-. As against the dismissal of the special damages of Rs.25,000/- the plaintiff had filed Cross Objection No.92/2009.
2. A complaint was given by the defendant to the police against the plaintiff and another alleging commission of offences under Sections 341, 342, 294(b) and 506(ii) r/w Section 34 of I.P.C. Based on the complaint, the police registered a crime as Crime No.88/1998. After investigation, the police filed a refer report. Hence, the defendant filed a protest complaint before the learned Magistrate as CMP No.4491/1998. On 25.11.1999 to which date, the case was posted for trial for recording the evidence of the complainant, he was abse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.