IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Ashok Bhushan, A.M. Shaffique, JJ.
Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (The Chief Wildlife Warden) & Others - Appellants
Vs.
The Secretary, Paramekkavu Devaswom - Respondent
W.A. Nos. 1650, 1961, 1981, 1995 of 2014 & W.P. (C) No. 34517, 17848 of 2014
Decided On : 31-03-2015
Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Section 40A, 40(2), 43, 43(1) and 43(2) - Issue pertaining to transfer/sale/transaction/transportation of elephants in State of Kerala - Issue in view of fact that State of Kerala is known for its rich wealth of elephants and large number of traditions and rituals being associated with elephants in different ceremonies being performed in temples and other places - Petitioner claimed to be running activities of - Petitioner is in need of an elephant for performing poojas and rituals in connection with the temple petitioner claimed to have approached Principal Chief Conservator of Forests seeking permission to purchase an elephant from other State like Assam and Arunachal Pradesh - Held, Rules have already been framed by the State Government. Thus, with effect from 2003 all declarations for animals which were not earlier made under Section 40 are required to be made to the Forest Officer - Intendment is clear that sale and purchase of elephant was prohibited - Not only proper sale or offer for sale was prohibited, but any other mode of consideration of commercial nature was prohibited - Object was that elephant need not be subjected to commercial transaction - Those transfers, which are not prohibited under Act, for them alone report to the Chief Wild Life Warden is contemplated - For example, gift of captive animal is not prohibited by Section 43 in event person makes valid gift, he has to report under Section 43(2) to Chief Wild Life Warden - Section 40(2) shall be applicable only in those transfers, which are not hit by Section 43(1) - In view of learned Single Judge that by virtue of Section 43(2), only after acquiring an elephant the report is submitted is not correct - Prior permission under Section 40(2) of Chief Wild Life Warden is necessary for transfer, which is not hit by Section 43(1) - Section 43(2) has to be held to be applicable only to those transfers or transport, which are not hit by Section 43(1) and for which prior permission has been obtained under Section 40(2).
Ashok Bhushan, J.
These four Writ Appeals and one Writ Petition raise an important issue pertaining to transfer/sale/transaction/transportation of elephants in the State of Kerala. The issue assumes more importance in view of the fact that the State of Kerala is known for its rich wealth of elephants and large number of traditions and rituals being associated with elephants in different ceremonies being performed in temples and other places. W.A. No. 1650 of 2014 is being treated as the leading case, facts of which case are being noted in detail.
W.A. No. 1650 of 2014
2. This Writ Appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 28.8.2014 in W.P(C). No. 17848 of 2014, by which judgment the Writ Petition filed by the Secretary, Paramekkavu Devaswom, has been disposed of holding that no permission is required from the Chief Forest Conservator to obtain an elephant from outside the State. The petitioner pleaded in the Writ Petition that a devotee Mrs. Vinitha Watson, native of Thrissur and settled in U.S.A, an ardent devotee of the Lord Bhagavathy of Paramekkavu, wants to offer an elephant to the Devaswom, for which she deposited 90,000/- US$ in the account of the Devaswom. The petitioner made an application to the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests seeking permission for purchasing an elephant from Kerala itself. Copy of the said application dated 25.10.2012 has been produced as Exhibit P1. By Exhibit P2 letter dated 5.11.2012, the petitioner was asked by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Wildlife) and Chief Wildlife Warden to submit an application in the prescribed form. The petitioner again submitted Exhibit P3 representation dated 20.1.2014 making a request to grant permission to procure male elephant from outside the State of Kerala. The request of the petitioner was rejected by Exhibit P4 order dated 31.1.2014 stating that "sale involving commercial nature for elephant is prohibited as per Section 43(1) of Wildlife (P) Act, 1972". The petitioner challenged the order dated 31.1.2014 in W.P(C).17848 of 2014 relying on the decision reported in Venkitachalam, V.R. Vs. State of Kerala and Others, praying for the following reliefs:
"i. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondents to give prior permission to the petitioner to procure and transport to the petitioner Devaswom an elephant (tusker) from the state of Assam or Bihar."
The learned Single Judge by judgment dated 28.8.2014 disposed of the Writ Petition, against which judgment the Writ Appeal has been filed.
W.A. No. 1961 of 2014
3. This Writ Appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 23.10.2014 passed in W.P(C). No. 27680 of 2014, by which judgment the learned Single Judge, relying on the judgment dated 28.8.2014 in W.P(C). No. 17848 of 2014, disposed of the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition was filed by the Parkkadi Kshetra Kshema Samithi. The petitioner claimed to be running activities of the Anjur Sree Parakkadi Bhagavathi Kshethram. It was stated in the Writ Petition that the petitioner is in need of an elephant for performing poojas and rituals in connection with the temple. The petitioner claimed to have approached the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests seeking permission to purchase an elephant from other State like Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. Copy of the said representation dated 25.1.2014 has been produced as Exhibit P1, by which necessary permission was sought for. By Exhibit P2 communication dated 4.2.2014 the petitioner was informed by the Additional Principal Chief Forest Conservator as follows:
"I am to inform that your application for availing an elephant is not permissible as per Section 43(1) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972".
The petitioner in the Writ Petition has prayed for a mandamus directing the respondents to give prior permission to the petitioner to procure and transport to the petitioner Devaswom an elephant from the State of Assam or Arunachal Pradesh. Ano
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.