SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ker) 944

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
Adv. A. Santhosh – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sri. P.M. Habeeb, Advocate
For the Respondent: M.K. Pushpalatha, Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT :

Muhamed Mustaque, J.

The petitioner is the fourth accused in a Crime registered by the Vadakara Police as Crime No. 449 of 2008 under Sections 468, 471, 420 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code.

2. The petitioner challenges Annexure A final report and further proceedings in C.C.No. 864 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Vadakara.

3. The petitioner is a practicing lawyer. The allegation against the petitioner is that with the help of him, the sureties had submitted forged documents to release two accused in Crime No. 291 of 1999 of Vadakara Police Station, namely Ayoob and Abdul Salam. On enquiry, it was found that the documents furnished by the accused is fabricated and false and with an intention to deceive the authorities, who are acting upon such documents.

4. Based on enquiry and finding that the false documents have been furnished by the accused, a crime has been registered against the accused as well as the petitioner. The allegation against the petitioner is that the accused with the help of petitioner furnished documents before the court to obtain bail from the court. Annexure A is the final report in this regard.

5. A lawyer who is acting on beha


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top