SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ker) 1123

K.RAMAKRISHNAN
Sebastian Karukaparambil – Appellant
Versus
J. M. J. Silverster – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Celine Joseph, Advocate
For the Respondent:P.V. Kuriachan, Advocate

ORDER :

K. Ramakrishnan, J.

First Respondent in O.P. (Indigent) No.2/2012 of Sub Court, Sulthan Bathery is the revision petitioner herein. The first respondent herein as petitioner filed the above indigent original petition for permission to sue as an indigent person under Order 33, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. It is alleged in the petition that the revision petitioner herein had filed a false petition before Mananthawady police against the first respondent herein alleging commission of offences under section 341, 323, 294B and 506(1) of the Indian Penal Code and the police registered a crime as crime No.497/2007 and later submitted final report before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Mananthawady, where it was taken on file as C.C.288/2008. According to the first respondent herein the case was registered and final report was filed at the influence of the 5th respondent. So all the respondents were responsible for filing a false complaint against the petitioner. The first respondent was acquitted by the court below, he suffered loss of reputation on account of the false implication in the case and also suffered mental agony. So he estimated damages of 50,00,00
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top