K.RAMAKRISHNAN
Sajitha Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Prajith – Respondent
K. Ramakrishnan, J.
The above revision has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order passed by the court below in I.A Nos.1203 of 2015 and 1204 of 2015 in O.S No.317 of 2014 of Munsiff Court, South Paravur. The case of the revision petitioner is that the petitioner as plaintiff filed O.S No.317 of 2014 before Munsiff Court, South Paravur against the defendant for mandatory injunction on the basis of an agreement dated 02.07.2014, since the respondent did not vacate the premises as undertaken. So he filed the above suit for mandatory injunction to get vacant possession of the plaint schedule building. The suit was decreed ex parte on 30.05.2015 granting a decree for mandatory injunction permitting the petitioner to get vacant possession of the plaint schedule building through court. Petitioner filed E.P No.17 of 2014 to execute the decree and at that time the respondent filed I.A No.1203 of 2015 to set aside the ex parte decree along with I.A no.1204 of 2015 to condone the delay. Those applications were dismissed for default and delivery was ordered and he filed I.A No.934 of 2016 to restore those applications. But that was also dismissed by the court below which was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.