SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Ker) 846

P.D.RAJAN
T. K. Hashim – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Sub Inspector – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M. Thamban and T. Sudhamani, Advocates.

ORDER :

P.D. RAJAN, J.

1. The revision petitioner was convicted by the trial court under section 55(a) of the Abkari Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- with a default sentence of simple imprisonment for one year. An appeal preferred was dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc-1), Kasaragod, confirming the conviction passed by the trial court. Challenging the said judgments, the accused preferred this revision petition.

2. The prosecution case is that on 16.8.1997, the Assistant Sub Inspector of Police, Chandera Police Station was conducting patrol duty within his jurisdiction. When he reached at Trikaripur, the revision petitioner was found near a waiting shed at Olavara with a suitcase. He intercepted and interrogated the revision petitioner, after that he opened the suitcase in which he found 30 bottles of Karanataka made arrack each containing 180 ml. At about 4.45 p.m., the revision petitioner was arrested by the A.S.I. and the arrack with bottles and suit case were taken into custody after preparing a mahazar. He took two samples from the bottles and reached at the Police Station, registered a cr
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top