SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Ker) 847

P.N.RAVINDRAN
Venugopalan. V. R. – Appellant
Versus
Secretary – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. N. James Koshy, T. Sanjay
For the Respondent: Sri. Murali Purushothaman

JUDGMENT :

P.N. Ravindran, J.

The first petitioner is a resident of Ward No.27 of Tripunithura Municipality. He is also the Councillor representing Ward No.27 of Tripunithura Municipality. Ward No.27 was an unreserved constituency during the elections held in the year 2005. It is stated that the first petitioner intends to contest the ensuing elections from the same constituency, which is presently Ward No.39. The second petitioner is a member of a scheduled caste community (Pulaya) and a resident of Ward No.8 of Tripunithura Municipality.

2. In this writ petition, petitioners challenge Ext.P6 proceedings issued by the Regional Joint Director of Urban Affairs, Kochi, by which the said authority rejected the objections raised by the first petitioner to allotment/reservation of seats in favour of scheduled caste candidates including women candidates under the provisions of Article 243(T) of the Constitution of India read with Sections 6(9) and 69 of the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994. The petitioners state that during the elections held in the year 2005, Tripunithura Municipality consisted of 51 constituencies of which 15 seats were reserved for women candidates, 6 seats were reserved fo






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top