SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Ker) 881

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA - Respondent
Criminal M.C. No. 3788 of 2010
Decided on : 15-11-2010

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : John Varghese.
For the Respondent: A. Sreekala.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of Customs Officials to interim custody of seized foreign liquor and the requirement for compliance with Foreign Liquor Rules and the Kerala Abkari Act for delivery to any licensee.

Headnote:

The judgment discusses the provisions of the Customs Act related to warehousing, specifically Sections 58, 59, and 67. It emphasizes the rights of importers to deposit goods in warehouses and the authority to transfer goods from one warehouse to another. The court held that the Excise Officials are not entitled to seize foreign liquor while it is in the custody of Customs Officials, and granted interim custody of the seized foreign liquor to the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, with the condition that delivery to any licensee must comply with the provisions of Foreign Liquor Rules and the Kerala Abkari Act.

Fact of the Case:

The Assistant Commissioner of Customs filed a petition for interim custody of seized foreign liquor, which was originally deposited in a Customs Bonded Warehouse in New Delhi and was being transported to another bonded warehouse in Kochi. The liquor was seized by the Excise Authorities during the transfer.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the petition, set aside the previous order, and directed the release of the goods to the petitioner on executing necessary bond for interim custody.

Issues: The main issue was the entitlement to interim custody of the seized foreign liquor and the compliance with Foreign Liquor Rules and the Kerala Abkari Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Excise Officials are not entitled to seize foreign liquor while it is in the custody of Customs Officials, and granted interim custody of the seized foreign liquor to the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, with the condition that delivery to any licensee must comply with the provisions of Foreign Liquor Rules and the Kerala Abkari Act.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, the previous order was set aside, and the release of the goods to the petitioner on executing necessary bond for interim custody was directed.

ORDER :

M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.

1. Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Kochi filed C.M.P. 777/2010 in Crime 65/2009 of Excise Range, Ernakulam u/s 451 of Code of Criminal Procedure for interim custody of 1360 litres of foreign made foreign liquor seized by the Excise Inspector, Ernakulam near south railway station on 25-11-2009. By Annexure A19 order, learned Magistrate dismissed the petition. Petition is filed u/s 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to quash Annexure A19 order and to get interim custody of the liquor.

2. Standing Counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel appearing for third respondent who got themselves impleaded were heard.

3. Chapter IX of Customs Act 1967 deals with Warehousing. u/s 57, any warehousing station, the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs, may appoint public warehouses wherein dutiable goods may be deposited. u/s 58, at any warehousing station, the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs may license private warehouses wherein dutiable goods imported by or on behalf of the licensee, or any other imported goods in respect of which facilities for deposit in a public warehouse are not available, may be deposited. Sub-section (1) of Section 59 provides that the importer of any goods specified in sub-section (1) of Section 61, which have been entered for warehousing and assessed to duty u/s 17 or Section 18 shall execute a bond binding himself in a sum equal to twice the amount of the duty assessed on such goods - (a) to observe all the provisions of the Act and the rules and regulations in respect of such goods (b) to pay on or before a date specified in a notice of demand - (i) all duties; and interest, if any, payable under sub-section (2) of Section 61; (ii) rent and charges claimable on account of such goods under the Act, together with interest on the same from the date so specified and (c) to discharge all penalties incurred for violation of the provisions of the Act and the rules and regulations in respect of such goods. Section 60 provides that when the provisions of Section 59 have been complied, proper officer may make an order permitting deposit of goods in a warehouse. u/s 61, any warehoused goods may be left in the warehouse, in which they are deposited, or in any warehouse to which they may be removed. Section 62 provides that all warehoused goods shall be subject to the control of the proper officer and no person shall enter a warehouse or remove any goods there from without the permission of the proper officer. Section 64 deals with the right of the owner to deal with warehoused goods. Section 67 provides for removal of goods from one warehouse to another. Under the said section, the owner of any warehoused goods may, with the permission of the proper officer, remove them from one warehouse to another subject to such conditions as may be prescribed for the due arrival of the warehoused goods at the warehouse to which removal is permitted.

4. Therefore when Section 58 and 59 of Customs Act enables the importer of any goods to deposit imported dutiable goods on executing necessary bond binding him as provided therein, Section 67 enables the owner of such goods to remove the goods from one warehouse to another. Annexure R3(a) to R3(o) the certificates of registration and the form of application for transfer of goods from one warehouse to another, establish that request was made for transfer of the foreign liquor so deposited in Warehouse, New Delhi to bonded Warehouse at Kochi. Annexure A16 the communication sent by the Cochin Air Cargo Clearing House to the Assistant Commissioner of Customs establish that two shipments will be arriving from Bonded Warehouse, New Delhi to be deposited in CWC Warehouse, W. Island, Cochin by train on 25-11-2009 and the importer is M/s. CANA Traders, Thoppumpady, Cochin who have obtained necessary permission from Assistant Commissioner, Import Department. Th




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top