K.VINOD CHANDRAN
Mogera Nema Daivasthana Parankila – Appellant
Versus
Seethamma – Respondent
K. Vinod Chandran, J.
Essentially, the dispute in the Civil Revision Petition is between A party No. 9, K. Babu and A party No. 11, Mogera Nema Daivasthana Parankila; as arrayed before the Land Tribunal, Kasaragode. The proceedings under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as K.L.R. Act) was with respect to 3.29 acres in R.S. No. 260/ 4 of Mangalpady Village, Kasaragod Taluk. Suo motu proceedings S.M. No. 35/71 was initiated by the Land Tribunal, Kasaragod and title and interest over the above referred 3.29 acres was assigned in favour of Venkappadas (A party No. 1). B Party No. 3, Narayana Shenoy filed an appeal numbered as AA/Kozhikode/811/1972 and Appellate Authority (LR) Kozhikode by its judgment dated 21.7.1973 set aside the order in appeal and remanded it for fresh consideration. On remand the proceedings were renumbered as S.M. No. 1253/1976. During the pendency of the same, Venkappadas having died, his legal heirs assigned the property in favour of five different persons. A party No. 9, K. Babu, was assigned 1.78 acres. The dispute in the above revision is only with respect to the said assignment to A party No. 9; more specifically with respect
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.