SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Ker) 898

S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
Renu Alex. – Appellant
Versus
Alexander Muthalali – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Thyparambil Thomas Thomas, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S.K. Devi & Santhosh P.Abraham, Advocate.

ORDER :

S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.

1. The above three transfer petitions are filed by the same petitioner seeking transfer of three cases pending on the file of the Family Court, Kottarakkara to the Family Court, Kollam. Petitioner is the wife and the respondent, the husband. Matrimonial disputes of the spouses have given rise to three proceedings before the Family Court, one of them by the wife and the two others by the husband. The wife has filed O.P.No.616 of 2010 seeking a decree for return of gold ornaments and compensation. Husband has filed two other petitions as O.P.Nos.358 of 2011 and O.P.No.830 of 2011, the former to restrain the wife from collecting the amount on the policy taken in her name in the Life Insurance Corporation and the latter restraining her from entering into the matrimonial home. All the above three petitions are now pending before the Family Court, Kottarakkara. Petitioner/wife seeks transfer of the cases to the Family Court, Kollam as indicated earlier.

2. Notice given, the respondent/husband has entered appearance. I heard the counsel on both sides. Transfer is sought for by the wife on the ground that in view of what transpired earlier with respect to the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top