SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Ker) 898

K.HARILAL
Azzi – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Dinesh Mathew J. Muricken, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Liju V. Stephen, Public Prosecutor.

ORDER :

K. Harilal, J.

The Revision petitioner is the accused in CC.No.791/2006 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Aluva as well as the appellant in Crl.Appeal No.932/2008 on the files of Addl.District and Sessions Judge (Adhoc-III), N.Paravur. He was prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 109 and 506(1) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. After trial, the learned Magistrate found the Revision Petitioner guilty of the offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act and convicted thereunder. He was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-. In default, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. He was found not guilty for the offence under Section 506(1) of the Indian Penal Code. Though, he had preferred the above appeal, the appellate court also confirmed the conviction and sentence as such without any interference. This Revision Petition is filed challenging the concurrent findings of conviction and sentence.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that the Revision Petitioner along with the other accused entered into the private bus stand with a sword in his h








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top