SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Ker) 910

P.D.RAJAN, ANTONY DOMINIC
Sathiyamma – Appellant
Versus
Gayathri – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

P.D. Rajan, J.

1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment in OP No. 1530 of 2005 of the Family Court, Alappuzha. Second respondent in the above OP is the appellant. The above petition was filed by first and second respondents seeking maintenance and to set aside a sale deed. The third respondent in this appeal is the husband of the first respondent. The brief facts are as follows. The marriage between the first respondent and third respondent was solemnized on 01/03/1999 at the Bride's residence as per Hindu Customary rites, and at that time, third respondent was working in GREF. After the marriage, they resided together in the matrimonial home and in the wedlock one child was born to them who is the second respondent. The husband failed to maintain his wife and child and hence, MC No. 48 of 2000 was filed in the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Haripad and that OP was settled in the Lok Adalath and respondents 1 and 2 were granted Rs. 750/- per month as maintenance. The husband failed to pay the amount as directed by the Court. Moreover, in order to defeat the claims of wife and child, he executed a sale deed in favour of his sister. Actually no sale con
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top