SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Ker) 847

V.CHITAMBARESH
SURESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : K.P. Rajeevan
For the Respondent: Babu Joseph Kuruvathazha, V.K. Rafeek

JUDGMENT :

V. Chitambaresh, J.

Can the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation ('K.S.R.T.C. for short) depart from the general instructions issued by the State Government relating to the recruitment, conditions of service or training of its employees? The common order declining regularisation in service of empanelled employees is impugned in all the Writ Petitions and I shall refer to the parties and exhibits in W.P.(C) No. 8301/2013 for the sake of convenience. The petitioners who have been working for long as empanelled drivers in the K.S.R.T.C. seek regularisation in service on the basis of Ext.P1 order issued by the Transport (A) Department of the State Government. It is discernible therefrom that the K.S.R.T.C. submitted a proposal to the State Government for regularising empanelled employees in its service which however was not accepted in toto. The proposal was that all provisional employees who were in the panel of the K.S.R.T.C. as on 1.9.2008 and have put in eight years of service with a minimum of 120duties an year should be regularised. But the State Government by Ext.Pl order held that those provisional employees who were in the panel of the K.S.R.T.C. as on 21.12.2011 a










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top