P.B.SURESH KUMAR
M. P. KORAH, S/O. LATE PAILY – Appellant
Versus
RACHEL ZACHARIA ALIAS RAHEL – Respondent
Respondents 3 to 8 in the writ petition have come up with this review petition. Parties are referred to in this order as they appear in the writ petition.
2. Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the review petitioners, the learned counsel for the writ petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader.
3. The matter arises under the Transfer of Registry Rules, 1966 (the Rules). The facts relevant for the disposal of the Review Petition are the following: An item of property was obtained by the petitioner along with her parents, siblings and one of her sisters-in-law. Respondents 3 to 5 are the siblings of the petitioner and the sixth respondent is her sister-in-law who obtained the property along with her. The father of the petitioner died in the year 2003 and her mother died in the year 2011. After the death of the parents of the petitioner, she came to know that mutation of the property has been changed in the village records in favour of respondents 7 and 8 also who are the remaining sisters-in-law of the petitioner, on the basis of a joint Will alleged to have been executed by her parents. Ext.P5 is the copy of the Thandaper Account containing the entries in favour of respo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.