SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 802

K.T.SANKARAN
Vasanthakumari – Appellant
Versus
Sarojini – Respondent


ORDER

K.T. Sankaran, J.

1. The question involved in this Revision is whether donees under a gift deed, who were made liable to pay certain amounts to certain persons under the terms of the gift deed, are entitled to deposit before the civil court the amounts so payable and get such deposit recorded, when the genuineness of the gift deed itself is disputed by the persons to whom the amounts are to paid.

2. The petitioners in Revision filed O.P.No.12 of 2001 on the file of the Court of the III Additional Munsiff, Thrissur, under Section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act, to record the deposit of amounts as per the terms of settlement deed, No.6148 of 1981, Sub Registrars Office, Thrissur. The petitioners are the widow and children of late Gangadharan, who died on 21.1.2000. The first respondent is the sister of Gangadharan. Respondents 2 to 5 are the legal representatives of Kalyani, another sister of Gangadharan. The sixth respondent is the foster son of Ammu, mother of Gangadharan. The property in question belonged to Ammu. She executed settlement deed No.6148/81, Sub Registrars Officer, Thrissur, in favour of her son Gangadharan. As per the terms of the settlement deed, the donee G




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top